Cei de al Consumer Reports nu au gasit nici o diferenta de viteaza intre iPad si iPad 2

Sincer, eu chiar sunt curios cine ii finanteaza pe cei de la Consumer Reports ?
Dupa scandaul Antennagate, cand initial au recomandat iPhone 4, apoi misterios au refacut testele si vai, sa vezi, are probleme cu antena si apoi declaratiile despre iPhone 4 CDMA, speram ca in sfarsit sa-si inchida portile, oricum sunt irelevanti de mult si nu cred ca mai prezinta vreun interes pentru public.
De daca asta, ei au avut tupeul sa declare ca iPad 2 nu prezinta o diferenta notabila in viteaza.
Iata mai exact cuvintele lor:

"One major difference in tech specs is that the iPad 2 has a new processor that's supposed to make it farOne major difference in tech specs is that the iPad 2 has a new processor that's supposed to make it far speedier than the original. While performing routine tasks such as Web browsing and e-mail in our tests, we didn't notice any significant speed improvement, as CR Senior Program Leader Dean Gallea notes in our video (right). The biggest speed boost, a 9x improvement in graphics processing, should be apparent when you run demanding 3D games, but it's not clear whether any games that take advantage of that higher speed are yet available. Surely some are in the pipeline for the coming months.

Ei declara asta in timp ce restul lumii publica aproape zilnic stiri despre viteza impresionanta a lui iPad 2.
Acesta a iesti mult mai rapid ca si Xoom, iPad si orice alta tableta de pe piata.
Uite aici am vorbit despre performantele lui iPad 2.
Iata si un clip video creat de ei:



Eu imi fac griji pentru un singur lucru.
Sper ca daca isi vad clipul peste tot sa nu creada ca il postam pentru ca suntem de acord cu ei ci sa-si deie seama ca il postam pentru ca ii gasim ridicoli.
Macar de data asta nu au recomandat sa nu-l cumpere lumea 

Sursa